Scandinavian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,633,273 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.709. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 230.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $119,756, a difference of 25.3%), per capita income ($43,848 compared to $54,264, a difference of 23.7%), and median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $46,972, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $69,174, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.43%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and family poverty (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 40.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.9%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 116.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 70.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 68.4%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 60.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%).