Basque vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,260,640 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Basque communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Basques within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Basques corresponds to a decrease of 27.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Basque and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,709 compared to $119,756, a difference of 23.8%), median female earnings ($38,352 compared to $46,972, a difference of 22.5%), and median earnings ($46,399 compared to $56,638, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,653 compared to $69,174, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,818 compared to $57,931, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Basque and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.9%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.1%), poverty (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Basque and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Basque and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Basque and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.1%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Basque and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 95.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Basque and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 60.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.58%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and ged/equivalency (86.4% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Basque and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 38.9%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.5%).