Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,329,726 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to a decrease of 30.3 Immigrants from China.
Potawatomi Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,774 compared to $119,756, a difference of 46.5%), median household income ($72,576 compared to $105,335, a difference of 45.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $122,178, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $57,931, a difference of 24.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $69,174, a difference of 27.6%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Poor
26.7%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 54.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.2%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Exceptional
9.6%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 53.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 46.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (63.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
24.7%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 71.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.1%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Poor
6.0%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 97.8%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 89.0%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.30%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
3.1%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 69.6%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 57.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.3%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%