Immigrants from Spain vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,502,442 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Spain communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Spain within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Spain corresponds to a decrease of 45.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,752 compared to $119,756, a difference of 15.4%), median household income ($92,732 compared to $105,335, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,051 compared to $122,178, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.33%), per capita income ($50,933 compared to $54,264, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,560 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.1%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 22.9%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (62.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.25%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.8%).