Hmong vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,479,462 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.578% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 1,578.2 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $54,264, a difference of 42.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $119,756, a difference of 42.1%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $67,353, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $57,931, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $69,174, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.61%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 96.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 79.6%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 51.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.0%).