Uruguayan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,531,406 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 234.3 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $119,756, a difference of 27.9%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $67,353, a difference of 25.5%), and median family income ($100,656 compared to $125,540, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $69,174, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 25.3%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.79%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.16%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 34.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 74.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 45.3%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 9th grade (94.1% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.15%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.9%).