Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 290,222,516 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 34.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $54,264, a difference of 45.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $119,756, a difference of 40.8%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $67,353, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $57,931, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $69,174, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 46.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.5%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.6%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 66.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 123.3%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 106.0%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 88.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.4%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.6%).