Russian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,340,577 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 11.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $119,756, a difference of 8.5%), median household income ($98,008 compared to $105,335, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $57,931, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($53,154 compared to $54,264, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $69,174, a difference of 2.3%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $125,540, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.81%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.8%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.50%), currently married (48.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.90%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 53.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.5% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 42.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.3%).