Malaysian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,986,244 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to a decrease of 54.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $54,264, a difference of 38.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $119,756, a difference of 35.6%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $67,353, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $57,931, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $69,174, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 35.4%), receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.9%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 44.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 96.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 112.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 98.3%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 43.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 34.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.0%).