Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,327,026 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.106% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 105.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $54,264, a difference of 67.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $119,756, a difference of 67.0%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $67,353, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 13.7%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $69,174, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $57,931, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 92.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 70.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 205.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 150.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 145.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 90.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.2%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.23, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 106.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 55.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 45.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 164.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 134.0%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 111.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 73.2%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.1%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.6%).