Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 953,122 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Immigrants from China.
Yup'ik Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,518 compared to $54,264, a difference of 77.8%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $67,353, a difference of 70.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($73,688 compared to $119,756, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $57,931, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,727 compared to $69,174, a difference of 13.9%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricYup'ikImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Poor
26.7%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 241.7%), single male poverty (31.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 178.0%), and married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 170.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 24.3%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
9.6%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 260.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (21.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 238.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 227.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 64.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 74.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (9.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 75.2%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (70.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.8%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 191.6%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 128.7%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 97.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (44.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and family households (72.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 11.9%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikImmigrants from China
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 202.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 47.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 45.3%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
6.0%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 149.4%), master's degree (8.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 147.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 136.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.44%), 9th grade (95.2% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and 11th grade (91.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
3.1%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 370.0%), hearing disability (5.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 122.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 94.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), ambulatory disability (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%