Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Moroccans

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Moroccan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,662,140 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 71.1 Immigrants from China.
Moroccan Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,117 compared to $119,756, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,138 compared to $122,178, a difference of 22.0%), and median household income ($86,468 compared to $105,335, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,256 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.8%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($41,872 compared to $46,972, a difference of 12.2%).
Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricMoroccanImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,854
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Good
$104,488
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Good
$86,468
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,838
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,499
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,872
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,256
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,117
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,138
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,683
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Poor
26.7%

Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 34.1%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.90%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricMoroccanImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.6%

Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMoroccanImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.5%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMoroccanImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.7%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Exceptional
83.2%

Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.0%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (61.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMoroccanImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.22
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.8%
Exceptional
24.7%

Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.54%), no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMoroccanImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.8%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.9%
Poor
6.0%

Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.9%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricMoroccanImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.2%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
3.1%

Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
Moroccan vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricMoroccanImmigrants from China
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%