Slovak vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,913,191 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to a decrease of 30.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,032 compared to $119,756, a difference of 26.0%), median household income ($83,798 compared to $105,335, a difference of 25.7%), and per capita income ($44,229 compared to $54,264, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $57,931, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $69,174, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 29.6%), single father poverty (19.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 29.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.84%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 36.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 35.2%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.98%), married-couple households (47.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (63.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 83.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 90.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.4%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 76.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.3%).