Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ottawa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ottawa

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
3,097
SOCIAL INDEX
28.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
233rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Ottawa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,168,188 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Ottawa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ottawa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.511% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ottawa corresponds to a decrease of 511.1 Immigrants from China.
Ottawa Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,012 compared to $119,756, a difference of 51.6%), median household income ($70,984 compared to $105,335, a difference of 48.4%), and per capita income ($37,101 compared to $54,264, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,366 compared to $57,931, a difference of 22.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,217 compared to $69,174, a difference of 30.0%).
Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricOttawaImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,101
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,380
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,984
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,721
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,611
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,378
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,366
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,012
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,953
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,217
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Poor
26.7%

Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 49.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.0%).
Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricOttawaImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.6%

Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 58.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOttawaImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 38.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOttawaImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.0%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.8%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.5%
Exceptional
83.2%

Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 47.8%), single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.2%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.7%), currently married (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.8%).
Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOttawaImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
63.0%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
24.7%

Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 105.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.6%).
Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOttawaImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Poor
6.0%

Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 96.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 95.0%), and master's degree (11.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.66%), high school diploma (90.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricOttawaImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.1%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.8%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.9%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
3.1%

Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 77.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 68.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.3%).
Ottawa vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricOttawaImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%