Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Immigrants from China
1,022
SOCIAL INDEX
7.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
326th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Jamaica Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,159,900 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.546. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 38.1 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,298 compared to $119,756, a difference of 43.8%), wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 41.6%), and median family income ($89,268 compared to $125,540, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.5%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $46,972, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $69,174, a difference of 28.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,766 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $89,268 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,851 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,026 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,040 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,625 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,038 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,298 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,035 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,027 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 18.8% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 76.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 50.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.6%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.9% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.7% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.8% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.2% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.0% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.4% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.99%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.2% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.6% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 65.2%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 57.2%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.33 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.8% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 15.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.8% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.4% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 125.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 88.6%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.9% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.7% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.2% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.8% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |