Guyanese vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,588,779 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to an increase of 15.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 45.8%), median family income ($93,373 compared to $125,540, a difference of 34.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,966 compared to $122,178, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $57,931, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($40,973 compared to $46,972, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,351 compared to $69,174, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 74.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.2%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.2%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 42.6%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.23, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 93.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 73.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 59.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 123.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 79.4%), and master's degree (13.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.3%).