Pueblo vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 2,453,481 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $119,756, a difference of 73.8%), per capita income ($32,012 compared to $54,264, a difference of 69.5%), and median family income ($76,880 compared to $125,540, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $57,931, a difference of 28.7%), wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $69,174, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 124.1%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 116.7%), and receiving food stamps (19.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 108.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and single father poverty (21.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 41.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 67.0%), male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 117.5%), single father households (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 79.0%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.4%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and average family size (3.79 compared to 3.23, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 42.2%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 40.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 106.1%), bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 89.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.36%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 81.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 76.0%), and hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age over 75 (55.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.2%).