Aleut vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Aleut
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Aleuts

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Aleut Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,089,446 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to a decrease of 55.8 Immigrants from China.
Aleut Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Aleut vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $67,353, a difference of 31.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,370 compared to $119,756, a difference of 31.1%), and per capita income ($42,210 compared to $54,264, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $69,174, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,377 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.0%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricAleutImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,210
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,702
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,446
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,241
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,168
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,719
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,377
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,370
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,052
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,708
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Poor
26.7%

Aleut vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 48.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.7%), and single female poverty (25.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and female poverty (13.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.7%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricAleutImmigrants from China
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Poor
11.8%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.9%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
9.6%

Aleut vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 55.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.9%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAleutImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.1%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.2%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Aleut vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 29.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAleutImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Aleut vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 64.9%), births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 59.4%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.080%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAleutImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.3%
Exceptional
24.7%

Aleut vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.8%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAleutImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.5%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Poor
6.0%

Aleut vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 109.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 86.0%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.87%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricAleutImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.4%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
3.1%

Aleut vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 59.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.9%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricAleutImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%