Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Married Couple
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in South Dakota

City Married Couples Poverty vs State vs National
1. Manderson White Horse Creek 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 4.5% (+95.5)#6
2. Wounded Knee 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#2 4.5% (+95.5)#14
3. Swift Bird 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#3 4.5% (+95.5)#32
4. Norris 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#4 4.5% (+95.5)#40
5. Okreek 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#5 4.5% (+95.5)#53
6. Peever Flats 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#6 4.5% (+95.5)#56
7. Mayfield Colony 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#7 4.5% (+95.5)#82
8. Onaka 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#8 4.5% (+95.5)#97
9. Corn Creek 85.7% 3.4% (+82.4)#9 4.5% (+81.3)#114
10. Clark Colony 84.6% 3.4% (+81.3)#10 4.5% (+80.2)#116
11. Little Eagle 82.6% 3.4% (+79.2)#11 4.5% (+78.1)#121
12. Marty 80.0% 3.4% (+76.6)#12 4.5% (+75.5)#129
13. Wakpala 77.8% 3.4% (+74.4)#13 4.5% (+73.3)#140
14. Bullhead 71.4% 3.4% (+68.1)#14 4.5% (+67.0)#163
15. Cherry Creek 66.7% 3.4% (+63.3)#15 4.5% (+62.2)#185
16. La Plant 65.0% 3.4% (+61.6)#16 4.5% (+60.5)#206
17. Parmelee 58.8% 3.4% (+55.5)#17 4.5% (+54.4)#281
18. Horse Creek 54.5% 3.4% (+51.2)#18 4.5% (+50.1)#328
19. Marvin 50.0% 3.4% (+46.6)#19 4.5% (+45.5)#402
20. Pine Ridge 49.4% 3.4% (+46.1)#20 4.5% (+45.0)#406
21. Porcupine 47.3% 3.4% (+43.9)#21 4.5% (+42.8)#438
22. Wanblee 44.0% 3.4% (+40.6)#22 4.5% (+39.5)#512
23. Kyle 38.6% 3.4% (+35.3)#23 4.5% (+34.2)#679
24. Fort Thompson 28.1% 3.4% (+24.7)#24 4.5% (+23.6)#1,161
25. Ashland Heights 26.3% 3.4% (+22.9)#25 4.5% (+21.8)#1,311
26. Fairfax 25.9% 3.4% (+22.6)#26 4.5% (+21.5)#1,342
27. Naples 25.0% 3.4% (+21.6)#27 4.5% (+20.5)#1,449
28. Bryant 24.2% 3.4% (+20.8)#28 4.5% (+19.7)#1,532
29. Glendale Colony 23.5% 3.4% (+20.2)#29 4.5% (+19.1)#1,603
30. Fruitdale 22.2% 3.4% (+18.9)#30 4.5% (+17.8)#1,758
31. Vivian 22.2% 3.4% (+18.9)#31 4.5% (+17.8)#1,768
32. New Effington 21.2% 3.4% (+17.8)#32 4.5% (+16.8)#1,887
33. Antelope 20.8% 3.4% (+17.5)#33 4.5% (+16.4)#1,921
34. Revillo 20.0% 3.4% (+16.6)#34 4.5% (+15.5)#2,063
35. Agar 20.0% 3.4% (+16.6)#35 4.5% (+15.5)#2,069
36. Utica 20.0% 3.4% (+16.6)#36 4.5% (+15.5)#2,075
37. Sisseton 19.8% 3.4% (+16.4)#37 4.5% (+15.3)#2,101
38. North Eagle Butte 19.4% 3.4% (+16.1)#38 4.5% (+15.0)#2,149
39. Brandt 19.0% 3.4% (+15.7)#39 4.5% (+14.6)#2,207
40. New Witten 18.2% 3.4% (+14.8)#40 4.5% (+13.7)#2,376
41. Mclaughlin 18.1% 3.4% (+14.7)#41 4.5% (+13.6)#2,397
42. Pierpont 17.2% 3.4% (+13.9)#42 4.5% (+12.8)#2,567
43. West Brule 16.7% 3.4% (+13.3)#43 4.5% (+12.2)#2,674
44. Edgemont 15.7% 3.4% (+12.3)#44 4.5% (+11.2)#2,928
45. Java 15.2% 3.4% (+11.9)#45 4.5% (+10.8)#3,039
46. Mission 14.8% 3.4% (+11.5)#46 4.5% (+10.4)#3,128
47. St Francis 14.3% 3.4% (+10.9)#47 4.5% (+9.82)#3,285
48. Frederick 14.3% 3.4% (+10.9)#48 4.5% (+9.82)#3,303
49. Kenel 14.3% 3.4% (+10.9)#49 4.5% (+9.82)#3,307
50. Whitehorse 14.3% 3.4% (+10.9)#50 4.5% (+9.82)#3,312
51. Oldham 14.3% 3.4% (+10.9)#51 4.5% (+9.82)#3,317
52. Twin Brooks 14.3% 3.4% (+10.9)#52 4.5% (+9.82)#3,335
53. Oelrichs 13.9% 3.4% (+10.5)#53 4.5% (+9.43)#3,426
54. Mound City 13.6% 3.4% (+10.3)#54 4.5% (+9.17)#3,514
55. Hecla 13.4% 3.4% (+10.1)#55 4.5% (+8.97)#3,587
56. Eureka 13.2% 3.4% (+9.81)#56 4.5% (+8.72)#3,669
57. Armour 12.5% 3.4% (+9.14)#57 4.5% (+8.04)#3,924
58. Ravinia 12.5% 3.4% (+9.14)#58 4.5% (+8.04)#3,971
59. Oahe Acres 12.1% 3.4% (+8.76)#59 4.5% (+7.66)#4,116
60. Summit 11.9% 3.4% (+8.50)#60 4.5% (+7.40)#4,235
61. Lower Brule 11.8% 3.4% (+8.40)#61 4.5% (+7.30)#4,277
62. Conde 11.8% 3.4% (+8.40)#62 4.5% (+7.30)#4,296
63. Tripp 11.6% 3.4% (+8.22)#63 4.5% (+7.12)#4,373
64. Morristown 11.1% 3.4% (+7.75)#64 4.5% (+6.65)#4,614
65. Ortley 11.1% 3.4% (+7.75)#65 4.5% (+6.65)#4,619
66. Erwin 11.1% 3.4% (+7.75)#66 4.5% (+6.65)#4,620
67. Big Stone City 10.9% 3.4% (+7.58)#67 4.5% (+6.48)#4,681
68. Agency Village 10.9% 3.4% (+7.55)#68 4.5% (+6.45)#4,704
69. Hosmer 10.4% 3.4% (+7.08)#69 4.5% (+5.99)#4,976
70. Burke 10.3% 3.4% (+6.92)#70 4.5% (+5.82)#5,077
71. Colome 10.3% 3.4% (+6.89)#71 4.5% (+5.79)#5,094
72. Chancellor 10.2% 3.4% (+6.81)#72 4.5% (+5.71)#5,145
73. Lake Poinsett 10.1% 3.4% (+6.71)#73 4.5% (+5.62)#5,190
74. Peever 10.0% 3.4% (+6.64)#74 4.5% (+5.54)#5,266
75. Nunda 10.0% 3.4% (+6.64)#75 4.5% (+5.54)#5,285
76. Hot Springs 9.9% 3.4% (+6.50)#76 4.5% (+5.40)#5,346
77. Canistota 9.8% 3.4% (+6.46)#77 4.5% (+5.36)#5,377
78. Johnson Siding 9.2% 3.4% (+5.82)#78 4.5% (+4.72)#5,812
79. Flandreau 8.6% 3.4% (+5.23)#79 4.5% (+4.13)#6,267
80. Pollock 8.6% 3.4% (+5.21)#80 4.5% (+4.11)#6,276
81. Glenham 8.6% 3.4% (+5.21)#81 4.5% (+4.11)#6,283
82. Avon 8.1% 3.4% (+4.74)#82 4.5% (+3.65)#6,660
83. Artesian 7.7% 3.4% (+4.33)#83 4.5% (+3.23)#7,063
84. Philip 7.6% 3.4% (+4.25)#84 4.5% (+3.15)#7,118
85. Webster 7.5% 3.4% (+4.15)#85 4.5% (+3.05)#7,208
86. Rosholt 7.5% 3.4% (+4.14)#86 4.5% (+3.04)#7,217
87. Lennox 7.4% 3.4% (+4.08)#87 4.5% (+2.98)#7,270
88. Isabel 7.4% 3.4% (+4.04)#88 4.5% (+2.95)#7,322
89. Alpena 7.3% 3.4% (+3.98)#89 4.5% (+2.88)#7,391
90. Kadoka 7.3% 3.4% (+3.95)#90 4.5% (+2.86)#7,416
91. Winner 7.1% 3.4% (+3.75)#91 4.5% (+2.65)#7,641
92. Mobridge 6.7% 3.4% (+3.31)#92 4.5% (+2.22)#8,110
93. Irene 6.7% 3.4% (+3.30)#93 4.5% (+2.20)#8,131
94. Fairview 6.7% 3.4% (+3.30)#94 4.5% (+2.20)#8,159
95. Lemmon 6.5% 3.4% (+3.16)#95 4.5% (+2.06)#8,293
96. Wilmot 6.4% 3.4% (+3.05)#96 4.5% (+1.95)#8,438
97. Garden City 6.2% 3.4% (+2.89)#97 4.5% (+1.79)#8,671
98. Arlington 6.0% 3.4% (+2.68)#98 4.5% (+1.58)#8,923
99. Scotland 6.0% 3.4% (+2.60)#99 4.5% (+1.50)#9,010
100. Eagle Butte 6.0% 3.4% (+2.59)#100 4.5% (+1.49)#9,019

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in South Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
85.7%
#7
82.6%
#8
80.0%
#9
71.4%
#10
65.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in South Dakota?
Manderson White Horse Creek has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the State of South Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in South Dakota is 3.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States is 4.5%.