Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Dakota

100.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Dakota

City Single Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Centerville 4.2% 13.1% (-8.98)#1 12.4% (-8.27)#626
2. Pringle 4.3% 13.1% (-8.89)#2 12.4% (-8.18)#647
3. Watertown 5.1% 13.1% (-8.02)#3 12.4% (-7.31)#864
4. Aberdeen 5.3% 13.1% (-7.83)#4 12.4% (-7.12)#920
5. Rapid Valley 5.9% 13.1% (-7.23)#5 12.4% (-6.52)#1,077
6. Huron 6.1% 13.1% (-7.08)#6 12.4% (-6.37)#1,109
7. Valley Springs 7.0% 13.1% (-6.17)#7 12.4% (-5.46)#1,376
8. Beresford 8.9% 13.1% (-4.22)#8 12.4% (-3.51)#1,965
9. Cherry Creek 9.1% 13.1% (-4.05)#9 12.4% (-3.34)#2,037
10. Sioux Falls 9.3% 13.1% (-3.82)#10 12.4% (-3.11)#2,089
11. Chamberlain 10.5% 13.1% (-2.62)#11 12.4% (-1.91)#2,450
12. Wagner 11.8% 13.1% (-1.38)#12 12.4% (-0.671)#2,852
13. Bristol 12.5% 13.1% (-0.644)#13 12.4% (+0.065)#3,098
14. Sisseton 13.4% 13.1% (+0.270)#14 12.4% (+0.979)#3,323
15. Summit 14.3% 13.1% (+1.14)#15 12.4% (+1.85)#3,579
16. Groton 15.2% 13.1% (+2.07)#16 12.4% (+2.78)#3,779
17. Baltic 15.4% 13.1% (+2.24)#17 12.4% (+2.95)#3,826
18. Rapid City 15.8% 13.1% (+2.65)#18 12.4% (+3.36)#3,958
19. Brookings 16.8% 13.1% (+3.67)#19 12.4% (+4.38)#4,233
20. Pine Ridge 16.9% 13.1% (+3.80)#20 12.4% (+4.51)#4,252
21. Miller 17.6% 13.1% (+4.50)#21 12.4% (+5.21)#4,404
22. White River 18.4% 13.1% (+5.28)#22 12.4% (+5.99)#4,568
23. Fort Thompson 18.5% 13.1% (+5.32)#23 12.4% (+6.03)#4,570
24. Pierre 18.5% 13.1% (+5.38)#24 12.4% (+6.09)#4,588
25. Lemmon 20.0% 13.1% (+6.86)#25 12.4% (+7.56)#4,869
26. Wolsey 20.0% 13.1% (+6.86)#26 12.4% (+7.56)#4,886
27. Peever 20.0% 13.1% (+6.86)#27 12.4% (+7.56)#4,944
28. Waubay 21.1% 13.1% (+7.91)#28 12.4% (+8.62)#5,135
29. Springfield 21.4% 13.1% (+8.28)#29 12.4% (+8.99)#5,185
30. South Shore 22.2% 13.1% (+9.08)#30 12.4% (+9.79)#5,361
31. Madison 24.5% 13.1% (+11.4)#31 12.4% (+12.1)#5,725
32. Veblen 25.0% 13.1% (+11.9)#32 12.4% (+12.6)#5,877
33. Bison 25.0% 13.1% (+11.9)#33 12.4% (+12.6)#5,882
34. Eagle Butte 25.8% 13.1% (+12.6)#34 12.4% (+13.3)#5,982
35. Lake Andes 27.3% 13.1% (+14.1)#35 12.4% (+14.8)#6,184
36. Armour 27.8% 13.1% (+14.6)#36 12.4% (+15.3)#6,266
37. Lake Preston 30.0% 13.1% (+16.9)#37 12.4% (+17.6)#6,562
38. Bonesteel 30.0% 13.1% (+16.9)#38 12.4% (+17.6)#6,571
39. Ethan 30.0% 13.1% (+16.9)#39 12.4% (+17.6)#6,576
40. Kennebec 30.8% 13.1% (+17.6)#40 12.4% (+18.3)#6,670
41. Piedmont 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#41 12.4% (+20.9)#6,941
42. Eureka 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#42 12.4% (+20.9)#6,956
43. Colome 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#43 12.4% (+20.9)#7,009
44. Flandreau 34.9% 13.1% (+21.7)#44 12.4% (+22.4)#7,185
45. Marion 35.0% 13.1% (+21.9)#45 12.4% (+22.6)#7,202
46. Murdo 36.0% 13.1% (+22.9)#46 12.4% (+23.6)#7,308
47. North Eagle Butte 36.8% 13.1% (+23.7)#47 12.4% (+24.4)#7,389
48. Whitehorse 40.0% 13.1% (+26.9)#48 12.4% (+27.6)#7,714
49. Fruitdale 40.0% 13.1% (+26.9)#49 12.4% (+27.6)#7,718
50. Elkton 40.9% 13.1% (+27.8)#50 12.4% (+28.5)#7,774
51. Martin 41.4% 13.1% (+28.2)#51 12.4% (+28.9)#7,809
52. Chancellor 41.7% 13.1% (+28.5)#52 12.4% (+29.2)#7,841
53. Winner 42.6% 13.1% (+29.5)#53 12.4% (+30.2)#7,904
54. Custer 43.9% 13.1% (+30.8)#54 12.4% (+31.5)#8,014
55. Edgemont 48.0% 13.1% (+34.9)#55 12.4% (+35.6)#8,273
56. Antelope 48.1% 13.1% (+35.0)#56 12.4% (+35.7)#8,279
57. Mission 48.5% 13.1% (+35.3)#57 12.4% (+36.0)#8,294
58. Elk Point 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#58 12.4% (+37.6)#8,359
59. Bullhead 52.6% 13.1% (+39.5)#59 12.4% (+40.2)#8,641
60. Spring Creek 53.6% 13.1% (+40.4)#60 12.4% (+41.1)#8,703
61. Scotland 53.8% 13.1% (+40.7)#61 12.4% (+41.4)#8,713
62. West Brule 56.0% 13.1% (+42.9)#62 12.4% (+43.6)#8,826
63. Wessington 57.1% 13.1% (+44.0)#63 12.4% (+44.7)#8,894
64. Little Eagle 58.3% 13.1% (+45.2)#64 12.4% (+45.9)#8,935
65. Lower Brule 59.6% 13.1% (+46.4)#65 12.4% (+47.1)#8,971
66. Agency Village 60.0% 13.1% (+46.9)#66 12.4% (+47.6)#8,994
67. Dupree 61.5% 13.1% (+48.4)#67 12.4% (+49.1)#9,088
68. Interior 62.5% 13.1% (+49.4)#68 12.4% (+50.1)#9,131
69. Rosebud 64.7% 13.1% (+51.6)#69 12.4% (+52.3)#9,206
70. Mission Hill 66.7% 13.1% (+53.5)#70 12.4% (+54.2)#9,311
71. New Effington 66.7% 13.1% (+53.5)#71 12.4% (+54.2)#9,313
72. Howard 69.0% 13.1% (+55.8)#72 12.4% (+56.5)#9,368
73. Wakpala 70.0% 13.1% (+56.9)#73 12.4% (+57.6)#9,400
74. Tulare 71.4% 13.1% (+58.3)#74 12.4% (+59.0)#9,458
75. Oglala 77.0% 13.1% (+63.9)#75 12.4% (+64.6)#9,582
76. St Francis 78.9% 13.1% (+65.8)#76 12.4% (+66.5)#9,616
77. Corn Creek 80.0% 13.1% (+66.9)#77 12.4% (+67.6)#9,651
78. Delmont 88.9% 13.1% (+75.7)#78 12.4% (+76.5)#9,781
79. Dakota Dunes 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#79 12.4% (+87.6)#9,850
80. Kyle 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#80 12.4% (+87.6)#9,967
81. Porcupine 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#81 12.4% (+87.6)#10,056
82. De Smet 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#82 12.4% (+87.6)#10,066
83. Whitewood 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#83 12.4% (+87.6)#10,095
84. Avon 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#84 12.4% (+87.6)#10,152
85. Wanblee 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#85 12.4% (+87.6)#10,173
86. Parmelee 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#86 12.4% (+87.6)#10,274
87. Hermosa 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#87 12.4% (+87.6)#10,320
88. Enemy Swim 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#88 12.4% (+87.6)#10,359
89. La Plant 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#89 12.4% (+87.6)#10,365
90. Soldier Creek 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#90 12.4% (+87.6)#10,379
91. Hosmer 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#91 12.4% (+87.6)#10,391
92. Marty 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#92 12.4% (+87.6)#10,491
93. Swift Bird 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#93 12.4% (+87.6)#10,510
94. Mellette 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#94 12.4% (+87.6)#10,513
95. Richland 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#95 12.4% (+87.6)#10,523
96. Norris 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#96 12.4% (+87.6)#10,551
97. Geddes 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#97 12.4% (+87.6)#10,573
98. Conde 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#98 12.4% (+87.6)#10,577
99. Davis 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#99 12.4% (+87.6)#10,584
100. Okreek 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#100 12.4% (+87.6)#10,598

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Dakota are:
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Dakota?
Centerville has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Dakota with 4.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the State of South Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in South Dakota is 13.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States is 12.4%.