Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in South Dakota

50.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in South Dakota

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Scotland 5.6% 35.0% (-29.5)#1 33.1% (-27.6)#374
2. Wolsey 5.9% 35.0% (-29.1)#2 33.1% (-27.3)#422
3. Fort Pierre 6.1% 35.0% (-29.0)#3 33.1% (-27.1)#438
4. Huron 6.2% 35.0% (-28.8)#4 33.1% (-26.9)#465
5. Worthing 6.2% 35.0% (-28.8)#5 33.1% (-26.9)#471
6. Whitewood 6.2% 35.0% (-28.8)#6 33.1% (-26.9)#474
7. Plankinton 6.7% 35.0% (-28.4)#7 33.1% (-26.5)#544
8. Brandon 8.0% 35.0% (-27.0)#8 33.1% (-25.1)#776
9. Ideal 8.3% 35.0% (-26.7)#9 33.1% (-24.8)#862
10. Clark 9.1% 35.0% (-25.9)#10 33.1% (-24.0)#1,002
11. Emery 9.1% 35.0% (-25.9)#11 33.1% (-24.0)#1,009
12. Canton 9.2% 35.0% (-25.8)#12 33.1% (-23.9)#1,028
13. Flandreau 9.6% 35.0% (-25.4)#13 33.1% (-23.5)#1,095
14. Armour 10.0% 35.0% (-25.0)#14 33.1% (-23.1)#1,181
15. De Smet 10.5% 35.0% (-24.5)#15 33.1% (-22.6)#1,279
16. New Effington 11.1% 35.0% (-23.9)#16 33.1% (-22.0)#1,449
17. Garretson 11.5% 35.0% (-23.5)#17 33.1% (-21.6)#1,517
18. Kimball 11.8% 35.0% (-23.3)#18 33.1% (-21.4)#1,566
19. Martin 12.5% 35.0% (-22.5)#19 33.1% (-20.6)#1,731
20. Yankton 12.7% 35.0% (-22.4)#20 33.1% (-20.5)#1,786
21. Colton 13.0% 35.0% (-22.1)#21 33.1% (-20.2)#1,850
22. Parkston 14.3% 35.0% (-20.7)#22 33.1% (-18.8)#2,145
23. Hermosa 14.3% 35.0% (-20.7)#23 33.1% (-18.8)#2,183
24. Tabor 15.8% 35.0% (-19.2)#24 33.1% (-17.3)#2,538
25. Pickstown 16.7% 35.0% (-18.4)#25 33.1% (-16.5)#2,800
26. Baltic 18.2% 35.0% (-16.8)#26 33.1% (-15.0)#3,129
27. Colman 18.6% 35.0% (-16.4)#27 33.1% (-14.5)#3,254
28. Wagner 20.0% 35.0% (-15.0)#28 33.1% (-13.1)#3,607
29. Hurley 20.0% 35.0% (-15.0)#29 33.1% (-13.1)#3,659
30. Stickney 20.0% 35.0% (-15.0)#30 33.1% (-13.1)#3,676
31. Henry 20.0% 35.0% (-15.0)#31 33.1% (-13.1)#3,677
32. Groton 20.8% 35.0% (-14.2)#32 33.1% (-12.3)#3,886
33. Webster 22.2% 35.0% (-12.8)#33 33.1% (-10.9)#4,262
34. Woonsocket 22.2% 35.0% (-12.8)#34 33.1% (-10.9)#4,274
35. Roslyn 22.2% 35.0% (-12.8)#35 33.1% (-10.9)#4,312
36. Madison 23.7% 35.0% (-11.3)#36 33.1% (-9.45)#4,655
37. Brookings 23.8% 35.0% (-11.2)#37 33.1% (-9.35)#4,689
38. New Underwood 23.8% 35.0% (-11.2)#38 33.1% (-9.33)#4,707
39. Mclaughlin 25.0% 35.0% (-10.0)#39 33.1% (-8.14)#5,036
40. Chancellor 25.0% 35.0% (-10.0)#40 33.1% (-8.14)#5,068
41. Hoven 25.0% 35.0% (-10.0)#41 33.1% (-8.14)#5,072
42. Tea 25.2% 35.0% (-9.81)#42 33.1% (-7.93)#5,147
43. Gregory 25.9% 35.0% (-9.10)#43 33.1% (-7.21)#5,312
44. Pierre 26.3% 35.0% (-8.72)#44 33.1% (-6.83)#5,398
45. Sioux Falls 27.6% 35.0% (-7.41)#45 33.1% (-5.53)#5,765
46. Dell Rapids 27.9% 35.0% (-7.11)#46 33.1% (-5.23)#5,856
47. Estelline 28.6% 35.0% (-6.45)#47 33.1% (-4.56)#6,048
48. Morristown 28.6% 35.0% (-6.45)#48 33.1% (-4.56)#6,128
49. Buffalo 30.0% 35.0% (-5.02)#49 33.1% (-3.14)#6,497
50. Oelrichs 30.0% 35.0% (-5.02)#50 33.1% (-3.14)#6,506
51. Murdo 31.2% 35.0% (-3.77)#51 33.1% (-1.89)#6,813
52. Agency Village 31.7% 35.0% (-3.31)#52 33.1% (-1.43)#6,920
53. Nisland 32.3% 35.0% (-2.76)#53 33.1% (-0.877)#7,076
54. Beresford 33.3% 35.0% (-1.69)#54 33.1% (+0.198)#7,299
55. Montrose 33.3% 35.0% (-1.69)#55 33.1% (+0.198)#7,414
56. Newell 33.3% 35.0% (-1.69)#56 33.1% (+0.198)#7,430
57. Egan 33.3% 35.0% (-1.69)#57 33.1% (+0.198)#7,507
58. Pierpont 33.3% 35.0% (-1.69)#58 33.1% (+0.198)#7,552
59. North Sioux City 34.3% 35.0% (-0.762)#59 33.1% (+1.12)#7,744
60. Peever Flats 35.3% 35.0% (+0.273)#60 33.1% (+2.16)#8,002
61. Rapid City 35.7% 35.0% (+0.670)#61 33.1% (+2.56)#8,084
62. Salem 35.7% 35.0% (+0.693)#62 33.1% (+2.58)#8,097
63. Bridgewater 35.7% 35.0% (+0.693)#63 33.1% (+2.58)#8,110
64. Keystone 36.4% 35.0% (+1.34)#64 33.1% (+3.23)#8,302
65. Box Elder 36.6% 35.0% (+1.61)#65 33.1% (+3.50)#8,370
66. Sisseton 36.8% 35.0% (+1.73)#66 33.1% (+3.62)#8,405
67. Watertown 37.1% 35.0% (+2.07)#67 33.1% (+3.96)#8,496
68. Sturgis 37.1% 35.0% (+2.08)#68 33.1% (+3.96)#8,497
69. Eureka 37.5% 35.0% (+2.48)#69 33.1% (+4.36)#8,596
70. Rosholt 37.5% 35.0% (+2.48)#70 33.1% (+4.36)#8,634
71. Brandt 37.5% 35.0% (+2.48)#71 33.1% (+4.36)#8,652
72. Pine Ridge 37.8% 35.0% (+2.76)#72 33.1% (+4.64)#8,702
73. Custer 38.6% 35.0% (+3.55)#73 33.1% (+5.44)#8,920
74. Spearfish 38.8% 35.0% (+3.80)#74 33.1% (+5.69)#8,961
75. Summerset 39.3% 35.0% (+4.26)#75 33.1% (+6.15)#9,083
76. Springfield 40.0% 35.0% (+4.98)#76 33.1% (+6.86)#9,246
77. White River 40.0% 35.0% (+4.98)#77 33.1% (+6.86)#9,297
78. Hudson 40.0% 35.0% (+4.98)#78 33.1% (+6.86)#9,320
79. Wentworth 40.0% 35.0% (+4.98)#79 33.1% (+6.86)#9,367
80. Freeman 41.7% 35.0% (+6.65)#80 33.1% (+8.53)#9,708
81. La Plant 41.7% 35.0% (+6.65)#81 33.1% (+8.53)#9,741
82. Belle Fourche 42.4% 35.0% (+7.33)#82 33.1% (+9.22)#9,879
83. Elk Point 42.4% 35.0% (+7.40)#83 33.1% (+9.29)#9,896
84. St Francis 42.5% 35.0% (+7.48)#84 33.1% (+9.36)#9,914
85. Mount Vernon 42.9% 35.0% (+7.84)#85 33.1% (+9.72)#10,019
86. Mitchell 43.4% 35.0% (+8.37)#86 33.1% (+10.3)#10,133
87. Aberdeen 44.8% 35.0% (+9.81)#87 33.1% (+11.7)#10,461
88. Dupree 44.8% 35.0% (+9.81)#88 33.1% (+11.7)#10,484
89. Menno 45.5% 35.0% (+10.4)#89 33.1% (+12.3)#10,634
90. Jefferson 45.8% 35.0% (+10.8)#90 33.1% (+12.7)#10,723
91. Vermillion 45.9% 35.0% (+10.9)#91 33.1% (+12.7)#10,732
92. Britton 47.4% 35.0% (+12.3)#92 33.1% (+14.2)#11,077
93. Chamberlain 48.8% 35.0% (+13.8)#93 33.1% (+15.7)#11,367
94. Lennox 49.0% 35.0% (+14.0)#94 33.1% (+15.9)#11,397
95. Lead 50.0% 35.0% (+15.0)#95 33.1% (+16.9)#11,530
96. Alcester 50.0% 35.0% (+15.0)#96 33.1% (+16.9)#11,603
97. Veblen 50.0% 35.0% (+15.0)#97 33.1% (+16.9)#11,712
98. Summit 50.0% 35.0% (+15.0)#98 33.1% (+16.9)#11,765
99. Tulare 50.0% 35.0% (+15.0)#99 33.1% (+16.9)#11,862
100. Letcher 50.0% 35.0% (+15.0)#100 33.1% (+16.9)#11,883

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in South Dakota are:
#1
5.6%
#2
5.9%
#3
6.1%
#4
6.2%
#5
6.2%
#6
6.2%
#7
6.7%
#8
8.0%
#9
9.1%
#10
9.1%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in South Dakota?
Scotland has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in South Dakota with 5.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of South Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in South Dakota is 35.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.