Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Educational Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Stephan 82.9% 8.9% (+74.0)#1 9.3% (+73.5)#47
2. Cherry Creek 68.9% 8.9% (+60.0)#2 9.3% (+59.6)#74
3. St Francis 68.3% 8.9% (+59.5)#3 9.3% (+59.0)#76
4. Nunda 61.9% 8.9% (+53.0)#4 9.3% (+52.6)#103
5. Milltown 60.0% 8.9% (+51.1)#5 9.3% (+50.7)#117
6. Spring Creek 55.9% 8.9% (+47.0)#6 9.3% (+46.6)#145
7. Kyle 53.6% 8.9% (+44.8)#7 9.3% (+44.3)#171
8. Clear Lake 41.7% 8.9% (+32.8)#8 9.3% (+32.4)#358
9. Parmelee 39.7% 8.9% (+30.8)#9 9.3% (+30.4)#398
10. Marty 37.9% 8.9% (+29.1)#10 9.3% (+28.6)#450
11. Wanblee 37.0% 8.9% (+28.1)#11 9.3% (+27.7)#479
12. Crook 35.8% 8.9% (+27.0)#12 9.3% (+26.5)#522
13. Enemy Swim 34.7% 8.9% (+25.8)#13 9.3% (+25.4)#584
14. Bridger 33.3% 8.9% (+24.5)#14 9.3% (+24.0)#644
15. Presho 32.8% 8.9% (+23.9)#15 9.3% (+23.5)#672
16. Waubay 32.2% 8.9% (+23.3)#16 9.3% (+22.9)#701
17. Allen 29.9% 8.9% (+21.0)#17 9.3% (+20.6)#832
18. Lake Poinsett 29.5% 8.9% (+20.7)#18 9.3% (+20.2)#853
19. Norris 29.4% 8.9% (+20.5)#19 9.3% (+20.1)#858
20. Timber Lake 28.6% 8.9% (+19.7)#20 9.3% (+19.3)#913
21. Mission 27.8% 8.9% (+19.0)#21 9.3% (+18.5)#985
22. Fulton 27.5% 8.9% (+18.6)#22 9.3% (+18.2)#1,012
23. Vermillion 27.2% 8.9% (+18.3)#23 9.3% (+17.9)#1,046
24. White Horse 26.9% 8.9% (+18.1)#24 9.3% (+17.6)#1,061
25. Oacoma 26.6% 8.9% (+17.7)#25 9.3% (+17.3)#1,093
26. Martin 26.4% 8.9% (+17.5)#26 9.3% (+17.1)#1,103
27. Mcintosh 26.1% 8.9% (+17.2)#27 9.3% (+16.8)#1,141
28. Tyndall 25.1% 8.9% (+16.2)#28 9.3% (+15.7)#1,236
29. Two Strike 25.0% 8.9% (+16.1)#29 9.3% (+15.7)#1,243
30. Batesland 25.0% 8.9% (+16.1)#30 9.3% (+15.7)#1,247
31. Virgil 25.0% 8.9% (+16.1)#31 9.3% (+15.7)#1,257
32. Isabel 23.9% 8.9% (+15.0)#32 9.3% (+14.6)#1,380
33. Chamberlain 23.7% 8.9% (+14.8)#33 9.3% (+14.4)#1,421
34. Dupree 23.6% 8.9% (+14.7)#34 9.3% (+14.2)#1,447
35. Summit 21.6% 8.9% (+12.7)#35 9.3% (+12.3)#1,755
36. Colome 21.6% 8.9% (+12.7)#36 9.3% (+12.2)#1,762
37. Horse Creek 21.4% 8.9% (+12.6)#37 9.3% (+12.1)#1,785
38. Pine Ridge 20.7% 8.9% (+11.8)#38 9.3% (+11.4)#1,969
39. Antelope 20.5% 8.9% (+11.7)#39 9.3% (+11.2)#1,992
40. Brookings 20.1% 8.9% (+11.3)#40 9.3% (+10.8)#2,079
41. Wakpala 20.0% 8.9% (+11.1)#41 9.3% (+10.7)#2,109
42. Dante 20.0% 8.9% (+11.1)#42 9.3% (+10.7)#2,120
43. Tripp 19.7% 8.9% (+10.8)#43 9.3% (+10.4)#2,207
44. Prairiewood 19.4% 8.9% (+10.5)#44 9.3% (+10.1)#2,279
45. Doland 19.3% 8.9% (+10.5)#45 9.3% (+10.0)#2,301
46. Fort Thompson 19.0% 8.9% (+10.1)#46 9.3% (+9.68)#2,389
47. Bullhead 18.6% 8.9% (+9.73)#47 9.3% (+9.29)#2,522
48. Newell 18.3% 8.9% (+9.44)#48 9.3% (+9.00)#2,637
49. Lower Brule 18.3% 8.9% (+9.42)#49 9.3% (+8.98)#2,647
50. Eureka 18.0% 8.9% (+9.11)#50 9.3% (+8.66)#2,757
51. Mclaughlin 17.9% 8.9% (+9.02)#51 9.3% (+8.57)#2,794
52. Canova 17.9% 8.9% (+8.99)#52 9.3% (+8.54)#2,804
53. Wallace 17.9% 8.9% (+8.99)#53 9.3% (+8.54)#2,806
54. Agency Village 17.1% 8.9% (+8.20)#54 9.3% (+7.76)#3,142
55. Avon 16.8% 8.9% (+7.98)#55 9.3% (+7.53)#3,247
56. Alcester 16.8% 8.9% (+7.97)#56 9.3% (+7.53)#3,248
57. Little Eagle 16.7% 8.9% (+7.80)#57 9.3% (+7.35)#3,332
58. Corona 16.7% 8.9% (+7.80)#58 9.3% (+7.35)#3,356
59. Oglala 16.6% 8.9% (+7.76)#59 9.3% (+7.32)#3,385
60. Morristown 16.2% 8.9% (+7.35)#60 9.3% (+6.90)#3,600
61. Bowdle 16.2% 8.9% (+7.29)#61 9.3% (+6.85)#3,624
62. Kenel 16.1% 8.9% (+7.26)#62 9.3% (+6.81)#3,648
63. Castlewood 15.9% 8.9% (+7.02)#63 9.3% (+6.58)#3,775
64. Frankfort 15.8% 8.9% (+6.92)#64 9.3% (+6.47)#3,837
65. Morningside 15.6% 8.9% (+6.75)#65 9.3% (+6.31)#3,925
66. Pickstown 15.6% 8.9% (+6.68)#66 9.3% (+6.24)#3,968
67. Lake Andes 15.3% 8.9% (+6.46)#67 9.3% (+6.02)#4,120
68. Madison 15.3% 8.9% (+6.45)#68 9.3% (+6.00)#4,128
69. Hosmer 15.1% 8.9% (+6.18)#69 9.3% (+5.74)#4,265
70. Ward 15.0% 8.9% (+6.13)#70 9.3% (+5.68)#4,312
71. Willow Lake 14.9% 8.9% (+6.04)#71 9.3% (+5.60)#4,368
72. North Eagle Butte 14.9% 8.9% (+6.03)#72 9.3% (+5.58)#4,378
73. Pukwana 14.8% 8.9% (+5.96)#73 9.3% (+5.52)#4,410
74. Eagle Butte 14.7% 8.9% (+5.78)#74 9.3% (+5.34)#4,546
75. Flandreau 14.6% 8.9% (+5.72)#75 9.3% (+5.27)#4,611
76. Faulkton 14.6% 8.9% (+5.68)#76 9.3% (+5.24)#4,640
77. Hazel 14.5% 8.9% (+5.65)#77 9.3% (+5.20)#4,669
78. Bison 14.3% 8.9% (+5.48)#78 9.3% (+5.03)#4,795
79. Midland 14.1% 8.9% (+5.21)#79 9.3% (+4.77)#5,022
80. Dell Rapids 14.0% 8.9% (+5.08)#80 9.3% (+4.64)#5,151
81. Ipswich 13.9% 8.9% (+5.07)#81 9.3% (+4.62)#5,166
82. Pierpont 13.9% 8.9% (+5.02)#82 9.3% (+4.57)#5,211
83. Redfield 13.7% 8.9% (+4.88)#83 9.3% (+4.43)#5,323
84. Claire City 13.7% 8.9% (+4.85)#84 9.3% (+4.41)#5,344
85. Sisseton 13.7% 8.9% (+4.81)#85 9.3% (+4.36)#5,371
86. Iroquois 13.7% 8.9% (+4.81)#86 9.3% (+4.36)#5,372
87. Orient 13.6% 8.9% (+4.77)#87 9.3% (+4.32)#5,419
88. Faith 13.5% 8.9% (+4.68)#88 9.3% (+4.23)#5,490
89. Elkton 12.8% 8.9% (+3.95)#89 9.3% (+3.51)#6,214
90. Badger 12.8% 8.9% (+3.95)#90 9.3% (+3.51)#6,218
91. Wilmot 12.7% 8.9% (+3.84)#91 9.3% (+3.39)#6,320
92. Clark 12.5% 8.9% (+3.65)#92 9.3% (+3.21)#6,511
93. Centerville 12.4% 8.9% (+3.56)#93 9.3% (+3.12)#6,640
94. Volga 12.3% 8.9% (+3.47)#94 9.3% (+3.02)#6,740
95. Spearfish 12.3% 8.9% (+3.41)#95 9.3% (+2.96)#6,818
96. Ethan 12.2% 8.9% (+3.32)#96 9.3% (+2.88)#6,924
97. Lake City 12.1% 8.9% (+3.25)#97 9.3% (+2.81)#7,023
98. Scotland 12.0% 8.9% (+3.14)#98 9.3% (+2.70)#7,164
99. Conde 12.0% 8.9% (+3.13)#99 9.3% (+2.68)#7,181
100. Warner 12.0% 8.9% (+3.11)#100 9.3% (+2.67)#7,195

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in South Dakota are:
#1
68.3%
#2
61.9%
#3
60.0%
#4
55.9%
#5
53.6%
#6
41.7%
#7
39.7%
#8
37.9%
#9
37.0%
#10
32.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in South Dakota?
St Francis has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in South Dakota with 68.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in South Dakota is 8.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the United States is 9.3%.