Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Wholesale Trade
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in South Dakota

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Brant Lake 51.0% 2.6% (+48.4)#1 2.4% (+48.6)#35
2. Porcupine 43.2% 2.6% (+40.6)#2 2.4% (+40.8)#42
3. Dolton 26.7% 2.6% (+24.1)#3 2.4% (+24.3)#126
4. Artas 26.7% 2.6% (+24.1)#4 2.4% (+24.3)#128
5. Hecla 25.4% 2.6% (+22.8)#5 2.4% (+23.0)#141
6. Ashland Heights 25.1% 2.6% (+22.5)#6 2.4% (+22.7)#143
7. Tolstoy 20.7% 2.6% (+18.1)#7 2.4% (+18.3)#211
8. Meadow View Addition 20.6% 2.6% (+18.0)#8 2.4% (+18.2)#213
9. Raymond 20.0% 2.6% (+17.4)#9 2.4% (+17.6)#230
10. Brentford 19.5% 2.6% (+16.9)#10 2.4% (+17.1)#238
11. Roscoe 18.0% 2.6% (+15.4)#11 2.4% (+15.6)#288
12. Pine Lakes Addition 16.7% 2.6% (+14.1)#12 2.4% (+14.3)#343
13. Harrold 15.1% 2.6% (+12.5)#13 2.4% (+12.7)#415
14. Isabel 14.1% 2.6% (+11.5)#14 2.4% (+11.7)#483
15. Mellette 13.9% 2.6% (+11.3)#15 2.4% (+11.5)#495
16. Twin Brooks 10.5% 2.6% (+7.93)#16 2.4% (+8.12)#863
17. Corn Creek 10.0% 2.6% (+7.40)#17 2.4% (+7.60)#939
18. Brandt 10.0% 2.6% (+7.40)#18 2.4% (+7.60)#943
19. Roslyn 9.7% 2.6% (+7.12)#19 2.4% (+7.32)#1,007
20. Menno 9.7% 2.6% (+7.05)#20 2.4% (+7.25)#1,021
21. Anderson 9.6% 2.6% (+7.02)#21 2.4% (+7.21)#1,028
22. La Bolt 9.5% 2.6% (+6.92)#22 2.4% (+7.12)#1,046
23. Pollock 9.2% 2.6% (+6.56)#23 2.4% (+6.75)#1,123
24. Mclaughlin 8.9% 2.6% (+6.34)#24 2.4% (+6.54)#1,181
25. St Lawrence 8.8% 2.6% (+6.17)#25 2.4% (+6.37)#1,225
26. Doland 8.7% 2.6% (+6.07)#26 2.4% (+6.27)#1,259
27. Scotland 8.4% 2.6% (+5.81)#27 2.4% (+6.01)#1,330
28. Pierpont 8.3% 2.6% (+5.73)#28 2.4% (+5.93)#1,356
29. Draper 8.3% 2.6% (+5.73)#29 2.4% (+5.93)#1,370
30. Castlewood 7.9% 2.6% (+5.35)#30 2.4% (+5.54)#1,481
31. Toronto 7.9% 2.6% (+5.31)#31 2.4% (+5.51)#1,489
32. Rosholt 7.8% 2.6% (+5.23)#32 2.4% (+5.43)#1,521
33. Kennebec 7.6% 2.6% (+5.00)#33 2.4% (+5.19)#1,608
34. Northville 7.6% 2.6% (+5.00)#34 2.4% (+5.19)#1,609
35. De Smet 7.4% 2.6% (+4.81)#35 2.4% (+5.01)#1,670
36. Faith 7.1% 2.6% (+4.50)#36 2.4% (+4.70)#1,830
37. New Effington 7.1% 2.6% (+4.46)#37 2.4% (+4.66)#1,852
38. Geddes 7.0% 2.6% (+4.44)#38 2.4% (+4.64)#1,860
39. Willow Lake 7.0% 2.6% (+4.42)#39 2.4% (+4.62)#1,873
40. Alpena 6.4% 2.6% (+3.78)#40 2.4% (+3.98)#2,223
41. Bruce 6.3% 2.6% (+3.70)#41 2.4% (+3.90)#2,281
42. Glendale Colony 6.2% 2.6% (+3.65)#42 2.4% (+3.85)#2,320
43. Centerville 6.2% 2.6% (+3.62)#43 2.4% (+3.82)#2,350
44. Claire City 5.9% 2.6% (+3.28)#45 2.4% (+3.48)#2,598
45. Claremont 5.9% 2.6% (+3.28)#46 2.4% (+3.48)#2,599
46. Selby 5.8% 2.6% (+3.21)#47 2.4% (+3.41)#2,642
47. Woonsocket 5.7% 2.6% (+3.14)#48 2.4% (+3.34)#2,688
48. Wakpala 5.7% 2.6% (+3.11)#49 2.4% (+3.31)#2,711
49. Strandburg 5.7% 2.6% (+3.11)#50 2.4% (+3.31)#2,719
50. White Lake 5.6% 2.6% (+3.05)#51 2.4% (+3.25)#2,770
51. Midland 5.6% 2.6% (+3.03)#52 2.4% (+3.23)#2,789
52. Platte 5.6% 2.6% (+3.01)#53 2.4% (+3.21)#2,810
53. Wilmot 5.5% 2.6% (+2.93)#54 2.4% (+3.12)#2,891
54. Elk Point 5.4% 2.6% (+2.84)#55 2.4% (+3.03)#2,980
55. White 5.4% 2.6% (+2.82)#56 2.4% (+3.02)#2,995
56. Hoven 5.4% 2.6% (+2.81)#57 2.4% (+3.00)#3,018
57. Chelsea 5.4% 2.6% (+2.81)#58 2.4% (+3.00)#3,025
58. Oldham 5.1% 2.6% (+2.49)#59 2.4% (+2.68)#3,395
59. Mobridge 5.0% 2.6% (+2.45)#60 2.4% (+2.65)#3,429
60. Parkston 5.0% 2.6% (+2.44)#61 2.4% (+2.63)#3,452
61. North Sioux City 5.0% 2.6% (+2.39)#62 2.4% (+2.59)#3,501
62. Canton 5.0% 2.6% (+2.37)#63 2.4% (+2.57)#3,527
63. Chancellor 4.8% 2.6% (+2.23)#64 2.4% (+2.43)#3,697
64. Frederick 4.7% 2.6% (+2.12)#65 2.4% (+2.32)#3,868
65. Stickney 4.7% 2.6% (+2.07)#66 2.4% (+2.27)#3,918
66. Dakota Dunes 4.6% 2.6% (+2.04)#67 2.4% (+2.23)#3,984
67. Mission Hill 4.6% 2.6% (+2.04)#68 2.4% (+2.23)#3,989
68. Cavour 4.6% 2.6% (+2.03)#69 2.4% (+2.23)#4,006
69. Bowdle 4.5% 2.6% (+1.95)#70 2.4% (+2.14)#4,139
70. Webster 4.5% 2.6% (+1.91)#71 2.4% (+2.10)#4,202
71. Tea 4.4% 2.6% (+1.80)#72 2.4% (+2.00)#4,365
72. Pukwana 4.4% 2.6% (+1.80)#73 2.4% (+1.99)#4,378
73. Oglala 4.4% 2.6% (+1.76)#74 2.4% (+1.96)#4,453
74. Worthing 4.3% 2.6% (+1.72)#75 2.4% (+1.92)#4,526
75. Bridgewater 4.3% 2.6% (+1.70)#76 2.4% (+1.90)#4,574
76. Hosmer 4.3% 2.6% (+1.70)#77 2.4% (+1.90)#4,575
77. Crooks 4.3% 2.6% (+1.70)#78 2.4% (+1.90)#4,580
78. Lemmon 4.3% 2.6% (+1.69)#79 2.4% (+1.88)#4,603
79. Stockholm 4.3% 2.6% (+1.69)#80 2.4% (+1.88)#4,609
80. Blunt 4.3% 2.6% (+1.67)#81 2.4% (+1.87)#4,637
81. Belle Fourche 4.1% 2.6% (+1.48)#82 2.4% (+1.67)#4,992
82. Tripp 4.0% 2.6% (+1.44)#83 2.4% (+1.64)#5,057
83. Hartford 4.0% 2.6% (+1.42)#84 2.4% (+1.62)#5,104
84. Brandon 4.0% 2.6% (+1.37)#85 2.4% (+1.57)#5,203
85. Howard 4.0% 2.6% (+1.37)#86 2.4% (+1.57)#5,207
86. Watertown 3.9% 2.6% (+1.29)#87 2.4% (+1.49)#5,400
87. Alexandria 3.9% 2.6% (+1.29)#88 2.4% (+1.49)#5,412
88. Garretson 3.9% 2.6% (+1.27)#89 2.4% (+1.46)#5,461
89. Hudson 3.8% 2.6% (+1.25)#90 2.4% (+1.44)#5,502
90. Badger 3.8% 2.6% (+1.25)#91 2.4% (+1.44)#5,514
91. Blucksberg Mountain 3.8% 2.6% (+1.18)#92 2.4% (+1.38)#5,660
92. Highmore 3.8% 2.6% (+1.16)#93 2.4% (+1.36)#5,708
93. Wolsey 3.7% 2.6% (+1.13)#94 2.4% (+1.32)#5,787
94. Colton 3.7% 2.6% (+1.10)#95 2.4% (+1.29)#5,858
95. Wessington 3.7% 2.6% (+1.07)#96 2.4% (+1.27)#5,916
96. Beresford 3.6% 2.6% (+1.00)#97 2.4% (+1.20)#6,055
97. Sherman 3.6% 2.6% (+0.972)#98 2.4% (+1.17)#6,143
98. Arlington 3.5% 2.6% (+0.922)#99 2.4% (+1.12)#6,269
99. Marion 3.4% 2.6% (+0.849)#100 2.4% (+1.05)#6,500
100. Piedmont 3.4% 2.6% (+0.800)#101 2.4% (+0.997)#6,640

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in South Dakota are:
#1
51.0%
#2
43.2%
#3
26.7%
#4
26.7%
#5
25.4%
#6
25.1%
#7
20.7%
#8
20.6%
#9
20.0%
#10
19.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in South Dakota?
Brant Lake has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in South Dakota with 51.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in South Dakota is 2.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States is 2.4%.