Samoan vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,039,967 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.829% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 1,829.0 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $71,021, a difference of 8.6%), median family income ($100,344 compared to $104,910, a difference of 4.5%), and median household income ($86,498 compared to $89,919, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $55,158, a difference of 1.0%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $52,306, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $45,027, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 14.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.6%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.42 compared to 3.43, a difference of 0.25%), family households (67.9% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.8%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.16%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.7%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%).