Immigrants from South Africa vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,116,815 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.023% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 4,023.4 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,465 compared to $41,017, a difference of 25.5%), median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $52,306, a difference of 20.3%), and median earnings ($51,850 compared to $45,027, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,234 compared to $71,021, a difference of 5.6%), median household income ($95,800 compared to $89,919, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $55,158, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.13%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.3%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.5%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.43, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 50.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 27.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 57.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 54.5%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and 10th grade (94.8% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.9%).