Immigrants from Mexico vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,109,415 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $71,021, a difference of 34.5%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $104,910, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $105,149, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.63%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $55,158, a difference of 9.4%), and median earnings ($39,114 compared to $45,027, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 63.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.1%), and family poverty (12.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.6%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.3%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and family households with children (31.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.1% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.52 compared to 3.43, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.56%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 130.2%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 43.9%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.3%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.29%), female disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.1%).