Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,850,316 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 12.5 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,806 compared to $41,017, a difference of 31.2%), median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $52,306, a difference of 27.9%), and median earnings ($56,183 compared to $45,027, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $71,021, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $55,158, a difference of 3.6%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 37.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.2%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.64%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 37.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.64%), married-couple households (48.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 76.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 51.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 87.4%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 72.6%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 38.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 32.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.7%).