White/Caucasian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,622,735 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.483. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 23.5 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $71,021, a difference of 20.7%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($82,029 compared to $89,919, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,197 compared to $45,027, a difference of 0.38%), median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $38,461, a difference of 2.5%), and per capita income ($42,180 compared to $41,017, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 16.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.14 compared to 3.43, a difference of 9.0%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households (65.1% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.70%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.080%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.52%).