Immigrants from Scotland vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,662,557 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to a decrease of 47.7 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $41,017, a difference of 21.6%), median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $52,306, a difference of 17.0%), and wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($94,091 compared to $89,919, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $55,158, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $71,021, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 42.5%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.2%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 40.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.75%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 41.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 11.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.3%).