Chilean vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,029,701 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.618% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 618.0 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $41,017, a difference of 13.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $71,021, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $52,306, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,605 compared to $89,919, a difference of 0.76%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $105,149, a difference of 1.4%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $104,910, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.17%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.6%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.7%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 38.2%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.5%), male disability (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.0%).