Immigrants from Israel vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,004,977 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to a decrease of 14.0 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $41,017, a difference of 39.9%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $52,306, a difference of 31.4%), and median earnings ($57,034 compared to $45,027, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $55,158, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $71,021, a difference of 1.7%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 32.1%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.1%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.0%), births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 36.4%), and single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.15%), currently married (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 102.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 96.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 9.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 59.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 106.5%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.8%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (90.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.4%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.6%).