Immigrants from England vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,980,646 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.227% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 227.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,844 compared to $41,017, a difference of 19.1%), median male earnings ($59,527 compared to $52,306, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($49,722 compared to $45,027, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($92,098 compared to $89,919, a difference of 2.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $105,149, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $55,158, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.090%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.9%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.43, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.92%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 39.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 39.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.6%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%).