Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,964,064 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $71,021, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($77,559 compared to $89,919, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $95,058, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $38,461, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($43,416 compared to $45,027, a difference of 3.7%), and per capita income ($39,529 compared to $41,017, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.60%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.2%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and currently married (43.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 62.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 36.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), college, 1 year or more (58.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%).