Alsatian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,447,423 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 6.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $41,017, a difference of 15.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $71,021, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $55,158, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $95,058, a difference of 0.0%), median family income ($103,010 compared to $104,910, a difference of 1.8%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 36.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 11.9%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 36.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.3%), family households (61.7% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple households (44.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.88%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 73.6%), no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 71.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 37.6%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.2%).