Austrian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,952,032 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.113% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 1,113.4 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,116 compared to $41,017, a difference of 17.3%), median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $52,306, a difference of 13.5%), and wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($91,339 compared to $89,919, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,692 compared to $105,149, a difference of 3.4%), and median family income ($111,306 compared to $104,910, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.5%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.43, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.3%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 35.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.87%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.4%).