Arapaho vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,398,291 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.667. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 63.7 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $105,149, a difference of 38.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $95,058, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $89,919, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $71,021, a difference of 19.6%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $38,461, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 73.9%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.4%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.0%), single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 133.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 116.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 116.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 37.3%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.43, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 6.0%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.30%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.5%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.0%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.1%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%).