Pennsylvania German vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,646,569 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 31.8 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $71,021, a difference of 34.3%), wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and median household income ($75,814 compared to $89,919, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $52,306, a difference of 2.8%), median earnings ($42,615 compared to $45,027, a difference of 5.7%), and per capita income ($37,842 compared to $41,017, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 27.2%), single male poverty (15.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.19 compared to 3.43, a difference of 7.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (49.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.16%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 28.0%), college, 1 year or more (48.5% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and college, under 1 year (54.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.3%).