Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,857,000 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 87.9 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 31.6%), householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $71,021, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $105,149, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,655 compared to $41,017, a difference of 1.6%), median male earnings ($51,446 compared to $52,306, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($45,820 compared to $45,027, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 57.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 50.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.0%), married-couple households (40.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and currently married (41.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.43, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 208.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 120.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 83.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 50.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 83.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 64.1%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and bachelor's degree (35.7% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), associate's degree (43.6% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.3%).