Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 308,277,692 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.627. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 11.4 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $41,017, a difference of 20.2%), median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $52,306, a difference of 16.5%), and median earnings ($51,624 compared to $45,027, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $55,158, a difference of 0.75%), median household income ($93,051 compared to $89,919, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.1%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.70%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.3%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.22%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 76.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 72.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 43.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 43.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 37.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.1%), male disability (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%).