Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,154,380 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to a decrease of 40.3 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $41,017, a difference of 18.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $71,021, a difference of 14.0%), and median male earnings ($59,278 compared to $52,306, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($91,015 compared to $89,919, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $105,149, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $55,158, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and single mother poverty (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.060%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.8%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 76.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 70.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 46.5%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 44.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.53%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.4%).