Immigrants from Micronesia vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,371,809 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.501% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 2,501.0 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $105,149, a difference of 19.7%), median household income ($75,574 compared to $89,919, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $95,058, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $38,461, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $55,158, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.3%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.3%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.64%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.43, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.1%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.4%), male disability (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.6%).