Costa Rican vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,111,758 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $71,021, a difference of 15.2%), per capita income ($44,090 compared to $41,017, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $55,158, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $95,058, a difference of 0.53%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and median family income ($103,989 compared to $104,910, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.38%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.3%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.43, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.7%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.1%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.8%), male disability (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.50%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.1%).