Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Native Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Native Hawaiians

Average
Average
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Native Hawaiian Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,215,466 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 36.9 Native Hawaiians.
Celtic Integration in Native Hawaiian Communities

Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $71,021, a difference of 17.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $55,158, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $89,919, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $38,461, a difference of 0.46%), median earnings ($45,732 compared to $45,027, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $95,058, a difference of 3.0%).
Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Income
Income MetricCelticNative Hawaiian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Tragic
$41,017
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Good
$104,910
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Exceptional
$89,919
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Poor
$45,027
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Poor
$52,306
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Tragic
$38,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Exceptional
$55,158
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Average
$95,058
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Exceptional
$105,149
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Exceptional
$71,021
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Good
25.4%

Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.9%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticNative Hawaiian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Average
11.2%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
17.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Excellent
15.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.8%

Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticNative Hawaiian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%

Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.39%).
Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticNative Hawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
82.3%

Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.8%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.43, a difference of 10.2%), and family households (63.8% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticNative Hawaiian
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
68.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
49.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.43
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
34.3%

Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 32.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.38%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.0%).
Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticNative Hawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
24.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
9.4%

Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticNative Hawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
57.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
43.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.96%).
Celtic vs Native Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricCelticNative Hawaiian
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%