Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa [ 101 - 200 ]

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
101. Newell 54.4% 31.2% (+23.2)#101 33.4% (+21.0)#1,777
102. Grundy Center 53.8% 31.2% (+22.6)#102 33.4% (+20.4)#1,866
103. Corning 53.8% 31.2% (+22.6)#103 33.4% (+20.4)#1,872
104. Royal 53.8% 31.2% (+22.6)#104 33.4% (+20.4)#1,875
105. New Vienna 53.8% 31.2% (+22.6)#105 33.4% (+20.4)#1,876
106. Malcom 53.8% 31.2% (+22.6)#106 33.4% (+20.4)#1,878
107. Blakesburg 53.8% 31.2% (+22.6)#107 33.4% (+20.4)#1,879
108. Victor 53.7% 31.2% (+22.5)#108 33.4% (+20.3)#1,893
109. Bancroft 53.5% 31.2% (+22.3)#109 33.4% (+20.1)#1,935
110. Martensdale 53.3% 31.2% (+22.1)#110 33.4% (+19.9)#1,979
111. Ashton 53.3% 31.2% (+22.1)#111 33.4% (+19.9)#1,980
112. North Liberty 53.0% 31.2% (+21.8)#112 33.4% (+19.6)#2,023
113. Arlington 53.0% 31.2% (+21.8)#113 33.4% (+19.6)#2,038
114. Baxter 52.7% 31.2% (+21.5)#114 33.4% (+19.3)#2,087
115. Kingsley 52.5% 31.2% (+21.3)#115 33.4% (+19.1)#2,122
116. Ocheyedan 52.5% 31.2% (+21.3)#116 33.4% (+19.1)#2,133
117. Bennett 52.5% 31.2% (+21.3)#117 33.4% (+19.1)#2,135
118. Stanton 52.3% 31.2% (+21.1)#118 33.4% (+18.9)#2,182
119. Dike 52.1% 31.2% (+20.9)#119 33.4% (+18.7)#2,222
120. Delmar 51.8% 31.2% (+20.6)#120 33.4% (+18.4)#2,260
121. Latimer 51.7% 31.2% (+20.5)#121 33.4% (+18.3)#2,270
122. Elliott 51.5% 31.2% (+20.3)#122 33.4% (+18.1)#2,316
123. Clearfield 51.5% 31.2% (+20.3)#123 33.4% (+18.1)#2,318
124. Eldora 51.4% 31.2% (+20.2)#124 33.4% (+18.0)#2,333
125. Durant 51.2% 31.2% (+20.0)#125 33.4% (+17.8)#2,368
126. Carroll 50.9% 31.2% (+19.7)#126 33.4% (+17.5)#2,417
127. Ogden 50.6% 31.2% (+19.4)#127 33.4% (+17.2)#2,468
128. Edgewood 50.6% 31.2% (+19.4)#128 33.4% (+17.2)#2,473
129. Atlantic 50.5% 31.2% (+19.3)#129 33.4% (+17.1)#2,489
130. Sibley 50.5% 31.2% (+19.3)#130 33.4% (+17.1)#2,492
131. Aplington 50.4% 31.2% (+19.2)#131 33.4% (+17.0)#2,531
132. Springville 50.3% 31.2% (+19.1)#132 33.4% (+16.9)#2,551
133. Belle Plaine 50.2% 31.2% (+19.0)#133 33.4% (+16.8)#2,569
134. Alta 50.2% 31.2% (+19.0)#134 33.4% (+16.8)#2,571
135. Logan 50.2% 31.2% (+19.0)#135 33.4% (+16.8)#2,572
136. Westside 50.0% 31.2% (+18.8)#136 33.4% (+16.6)#2,616
137. Washta 50.0% 31.2% (+18.8)#137 33.4% (+16.6)#2,617
138. Fredericksburg 49.8% 31.2% (+18.6)#138 33.4% (+16.4)#2,641
139. Boyden 49.8% 31.2% (+18.6)#139 33.4% (+16.4)#2,645
140. Knoxville 49.6% 31.2% (+18.4)#140 33.4% (+16.2)#2,669
141. West Liberty 49.5% 31.2% (+18.3)#141 33.4% (+16.1)#2,691
142. Hudson 49.5% 31.2% (+18.3)#142 33.4% (+16.1)#2,696
143. Graettinger 49.5% 31.2% (+18.3)#143 33.4% (+16.1)#2,705
144. Menlo 49.4% 31.2% (+18.2)#144 33.4% (+16.0)#2,738
145. Audubon 49.3% 31.2% (+18.1)#145 33.4% (+15.9)#2,751
146. Badger 49.3% 31.2% (+18.1)#146 33.4% (+15.9)#2,761
147. Marcus 49.0% 31.2% (+17.8)#147 33.4% (+15.6)#2,808
148. Sioux Rapids 48.5% 31.2% (+17.3)#148 33.4% (+15.1)#2,889
149. Parnell 48.5% 31.2% (+17.3)#149 33.4% (+15.1)#2,901
150. Colesburg 48.4% 31.2% (+17.2)#150 33.4% (+15.0)#2,921
151. Maynard 48.4% 31.2% (+17.2)#151 33.4% (+15.0)#2,922
152. Griswold 48.3% 31.2% (+17.1)#152 33.4% (+14.9)#2,943
153. Grand Mound 47.8% 31.2% (+16.6)#153 33.4% (+14.4)#3,034
154. Albia 47.5% 31.2% (+16.3)#154 33.4% (+14.1)#3,077
155. Rock Rapids 47.5% 31.2% (+16.3)#155 33.4% (+14.1)#3,078
156. Stacyville 47.5% 31.2% (+16.3)#156 33.4% (+14.1)#3,093
157. Farnhamville 47.4% 31.2% (+16.2)#157 33.4% (+14.0)#3,118
158. College Springs 47.4% 31.2% (+16.2)#158 33.4% (+14.0)#3,119
159. Dumont 47.3% 31.2% (+16.1)#159 33.4% (+13.9)#3,137
160. New Hartford 47.2% 31.2% (+16.0)#160 33.4% (+13.8)#3,165
161. Hartley 47.1% 31.2% (+15.9)#161 33.4% (+13.7)#3,183
162. Danville 47.0% 31.2% (+15.8)#162 33.4% (+13.6)#3,198
163. Union 46.7% 31.2% (+15.5)#163 33.4% (+13.3)#3,229
164. Mitchellville 46.6% 31.2% (+15.4)#164 33.4% (+13.2)#3,241
165. Eagle Grove 46.5% 31.2% (+15.3)#165 33.4% (+13.1)#3,260
166. Dallas Center 46.5% 31.2% (+15.3)#166 33.4% (+13.1)#3,261
167. Greene 46.5% 31.2% (+15.3)#167 33.4% (+13.1)#3,267
168. Dayton 46.4% 31.2% (+15.2)#168 33.4% (+13.0)#3,296
169. Woodbine 46.3% 31.2% (+15.1)#169 33.4% (+12.9)#3,312
170. Clarksville 46.2% 31.2% (+15.0)#170 33.4% (+12.8)#3,341
171. Gladbrook 46.2% 31.2% (+15.0)#171 33.4% (+12.8)#3,343
172. Glenwood 46.1% 31.2% (+14.9)#172 33.4% (+12.7)#3,355
173. Schaller 46.0% 31.2% (+14.8)#173 33.4% (+12.6)#3,373
174. Rock Valley 45.7% 31.2% (+14.5)#174 33.4% (+12.3)#3,417
175. Larchwood 45.5% 31.2% (+14.3)#175 33.4% (+12.1)#3,472
176. Doon 45.3% 31.2% (+14.1)#176 33.4% (+11.9)#3,528
177. New London 45.2% 31.2% (+14.0)#177 33.4% (+11.8)#3,544
178. Keokuk 44.9% 31.2% (+13.7)#178 33.4% (+11.5)#3,600
179. Hamburg 44.7% 31.2% (+13.5)#179 33.4% (+11.3)#3,641
180. Paton 44.0% 31.2% (+12.8)#180 33.4% (+10.6)#3,792
181. Marshalltown 43.9% 31.2% (+12.7)#181 33.4% (+10.5)#3,796
182. Lowden 43.8% 31.2% (+12.6)#182 33.4% (+10.4)#3,832
183. Lamont 43.8% 31.2% (+12.6)#183 33.4% (+10.4)#3,833
184. Bloomfield 43.6% 31.2% (+12.4)#184 33.4% (+10.2)#3,853
185. Sigourney 43.6% 31.2% (+12.4)#185 33.4% (+10.2)#3,856
186. Woodward 43.5% 31.2% (+12.3)#186 33.4% (+10.1)#3,887
187. Calamus 43.5% 31.2% (+12.3)#187 33.4% (+10.1)#3,894
188. Osceola 43.4% 31.2% (+12.2)#188 33.4% (+10.0)#3,912
189. Stuart 43.4% 31.2% (+12.2)#189 33.4% (+10.0)#3,920
190. Sheffield 43.0% 31.2% (+11.8)#190 33.4% (+9.60)#3,992
191. Nichols 42.8% 31.2% (+11.6)#191 33.4% (+9.40)#4,031
192. Hornick 42.8% 31.2% (+11.6)#192 33.4% (+9.40)#4,033
193. Asbury 42.7% 31.2% (+11.5)#193 33.4% (+9.30)#4,041
194. Arcadia 42.5% 31.2% (+11.3)#194 33.4% (+9.10)#4,100
195. Holstein 42.4% 31.2% (+11.2)#195 33.4% (+9.00)#4,131
196. Osage 42.3% 31.2% (+11.1)#196 33.4% (+8.90)#4,152
197. Spencer 42.2% 31.2% (+11.0)#197 33.4% (+8.80)#4,177
198. Guttenberg 42.1% 31.2% (+10.9)#198 33.4% (+8.70)#4,198
199. Wahpeton 42.0% 31.2% (+10.8)#199 33.4% (+8.60)#4,219
200. Newton 41.9% 31.2% (+10.7)#200 33.4% (+8.50)#4,226