Costa Rican vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,761,759 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 31.0 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,262 compared to $54,644, a difference of 59.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $60,305, a difference of 58.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $65,113, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 18.6%), median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $32,500, a difference of 21.9%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $36,876, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 98.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 98.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 97.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 48.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 54.6%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 59.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 75.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 68.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 47.4%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.0%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 81.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 69.6%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 64.4%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 61.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.3%).