Luxembourger vs Lumbee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Lumbee

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lumbee Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,457,196 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 84.9 Lumbee.
Luxembourger Integration in Lumbee Communities

Luxembourger vs Lumbee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $60,305, a difference of 61.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $65,113, a difference of 59.0%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $54,644, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $32,500, a difference of 22.7%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $36,876, a difference of 29.2%).
Luxembourger vs Lumbee Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerLumbee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$29,845
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$68,679
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$54,644
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$36,876
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$41,715
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$32,500
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$34,584
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$60,305
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$65,113
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$40,550
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
21.3%

Luxembourger vs Lumbee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 150.9%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 135.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 131.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 48.8%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 51.6%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 61.5%).
Luxembourger vs Lumbee Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerLumbee
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
23.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
31.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
26.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
33.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
31.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
31.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
30.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
25.2%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
33.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
28.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
43.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
18.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
19.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
22.9%

Luxembourger vs Lumbee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 108.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 80.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 75.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.2%).
Luxembourger vs Lumbee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerLumbee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.1%

Luxembourger vs Lumbee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 46.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 12.2%).
Luxembourger vs Lumbee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerLumbee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
56.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
75.6%

Luxembourger vs Lumbee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 63.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 63.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.36%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.32, a difference of 7.0%).
Luxembourger vs Lumbee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerLumbee
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
39.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
39.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
48.2%

Luxembourger vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 93.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.9%).
Luxembourger vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerLumbee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
10.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Good
55.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
23.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

Luxembourger vs Lumbee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 87.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 77.8%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
Luxembourger vs Lumbee Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerLumbee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
85.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
83.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
54.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
48.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
34.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
24.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.1%

Luxembourger vs Lumbee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 74.6%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 70.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.8%).
Luxembourger vs Lumbee Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerLumbee
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
32.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%