New Zealander vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,267,577 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.766. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.374% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 374.2 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $60,305, a difference of 74.3%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $54,644, a difference of 74.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $65,113, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 30.0%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $32,500, a difference of 30.6%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $36,876, a difference of 39.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 131.0%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 110.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 103.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 43.1%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 57.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 92.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 86.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 65.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.0%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 58.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.28%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 141.9%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 129.9%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 97.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 64.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 61.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.5%).