Osage vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,252,320 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.928. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.110% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 109.9 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $60,305, a difference of 40.1%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $54,644, a difference of 37.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $40,550, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $32,500, a difference of 10.9%), median earnings ($42,651 compared to $36,876, a difference of 15.7%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $41,715, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 95.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 80.2%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 74.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 27.0%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and single female poverty (24.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 68.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 51.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 50.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 43.1%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.3%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.2%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.5%), ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.7%).