Alaska Native vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,920,953 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 23.1 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $34,584, a difference of 56.1%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $40,550, a difference of 49.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $60,305, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 14.5%), median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $32,500, a difference of 17.5%), and median earnings ($43,750 compared to $36,876, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 89.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 80.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.5%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and single female poverty (23.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 41.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 83.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 26.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.1%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 25.9%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 68.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.2%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 118.2%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.2%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (52.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.5%).