Canadian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,428,405 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.931. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.330% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 1,329.7 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $60,305, a difference of 61.9%), median household income ($87,769 compared to $54,644, a difference of 60.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $65,113, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $32,500, a difference of 22.2%), median earnings ($47,911 compared to $36,876, a difference of 29.9%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 117.3%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 107.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 107.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 47.6%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 56.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 57.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 76.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 65.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.7%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 50.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.2%), no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 89.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 82.8%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 53.7%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.4%).